SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: grok who wrote (29660)9/16/1999 2:22:00 AM
From: Dave B  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
KZ,

This evolutionary path stretches back 30 years and came about as cooperation between the dram makers and the box makers.

I'm not sure the 30 years is correct. I don't believe Intel thinks that the EDO transition went smoothly. Here's a quote from the 1996 article (message #29650) I just posted:

Dennis Lenehan, director of Memory Industry Enabling for Intel, said the early support of RDRAM was inspired by lessons learned after the company's sudden switch from fast page mode to EDO DRAM, a change which caught many DRAM vendors unaware and is said by Intel to have in part caused a temporary EDO parts shortage.

"We've got to get more involved now in warning the DRAM industry," said Mr. Lenehan. "Looking forward, I think we need to get even more active. We need not only to give the industry some warning but we should work together to define DRAM for the PC future."