Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : To be a Liberal,you have to believe that..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (2644)	9/17/1999 12:01:00 AM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6418

I see that you won't answer whether there were 2 of each animal on Noah's ark. For the record I don't think there was even an ark. I think that it is all silly mythology, and can't understand supposedly grownup people believing there was an Earth covering flood and an ark. There is zero evidence of an ark, only wishful thinking. My conclusions on evolution are not just based on fossils, but on the fact that there is a clear progression from one species to another in that fossil record. For years scientists theorized that our current birds evolved from dinosaurs, to the laughter of the creationists. Last year an intermediate dinosaur with feathers was found. People like you refuse to even look at this strong evidence, but instead attack my person. I am challenging your beliefs, just as you have the right to challenge mine, but if you do, I want evidence, not opinion. If your beliefs are sound, they will survive challenges, and you have nothing to fear. A sound belief that survives challenges, like evolution has, becomes stronger. I would love to see the hard evidence that the Chinese scientist has to dispute evolution. Give me the link. Del