Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zirdu who wrote (621)	9/16/1999 11:17:00 AM
From: Tunica Albuginea	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

RRaney, perhaps my selection of gravity as an example to evolution is not a good one, I'll grant you that. However as you get into the molecular dynamics of living beings ( and I am a trained physiologist with extensive background in that aerea ) you are left in awe to surmise that this infinitely complex system, as complex as the theory of strings if you will, just happened at random. The point here is that as you walk through Biology and Physiology textbooks you extremely frequently find huge aereas of ignorance . When you lump that into all the other aereas of ignorance that we have of this world and become awed by it's beauty,complexity,perfection,ingenuity etc etc, it is moronic on the part of evolutionists to simply drop creation especially when gazillion very intelligent human beings over the centuries have spent giant amounts of time energy and ingenuity to produce works of art, music,literature trying to understand Divine intervention. Again, BOTH systems should be offered in schools, evolution and creation , one in science classes and the other in social studies and let the student decide. BTW, we offer psychology in science classes and there is nothing scientific about it.That to me shows how closed minded many scientists are. When I was in Medical School my Professor of psychiatry called Freud's work either one of the greatest scientific discoveries of all time or one of the greatest hoaxes! Goes to show you, TA Message #621 from RRanney at Sep 16 1999 10:51AM <If Evolution was a fact it would no longer be called a Theory. We would simply be taught " Evolution ". Just like we are not taught the theory of Gravity in Physics, but simply Gravity.>? I can't agree with this hang up or whatever that insists in calling evolution "only a theory", in contrast to physics, or gravity say, as a "fact." There are different theories of gravity, in the past, and even now. Before Newton, gravity was more or less a mystery. He came up with a theory that sort of explained it. At least he made it possible to calculate the effects of gravity. It was and is a wonderful theory. Now we believe that theory is slightly wrong. Einstein came up with an alternate theory of gravity, which is called general relativity. So far, it has passed every test given to it. It too is a wonderful and subtle theory, that explains a lot more than Newton's theory of gravity, while containing within it most everything that Newton said, as a limiting and special case. But Physicists now believe that General Relativity as a theory of gravity cannot be the entire and final truth. It is incompatible with Quantum Mechanics, for one. It contains within it infinite quantities, as in the calculations for the exact center of a black hole. There must be another theory, more complicated and encompassing than General Relativity, that contains within it both a general theory of gravity, and quantum mechanics. The best candidate so far is what is called string theory. So far, there is no consensus on such a theory. But even in physics, right now, Gravity is still very very much a "theory", and not a fact. Actually, I would say evolution, is much more "fact like" than "theory like." And I think of evolution as more of a "factual happening", than I think of gravity as a fact. Gravity is really a big mystery (and I am trained as a physicist), much more than the fact of evolution happening on this earth over the past billion years or so.