SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (67803)9/16/1999 1:48:00 PM
From: Cape Blanco  Respond to of 132070
 
OK, you had me worried for a moment.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (67803)9/16/1999 2:13:00 PM
From: Joss  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike,
submitted for general thread amusement:

Clinton's Mortgage
JUST DESSERT, A COLUMN BY DALE MCFEATTERS,
SCRIPPS HOWARD NEWS SERVICE

Hi, Mr. and Mrs. Clinton. Welcome to EZBreeZee Mortgages. I'm Alan
Greenspan. No, no relation sorry to say. May I call you Bill and
Hillary?

Fine, first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton and Bill it is.

So you want to buy the old Rye Brook place, four-something acres as I
recall. That's 2.2 million, and with the customary 20 percent
down-that's $440,000--leaving a mortgage of $1,760,000.

No problem. We do those kinds of deals all the time. Now let's have a
look at your financial statements.

Let's see, Mr. Clinton, you are the president of the United States, of course, and you salary is-oh, dear--$200,000 a year. We recommend
buying a house that costs no more than two and a half times your annual salary.

That means you should be looking for something around $500,000, perhaps a nice brick rancher on a quarter of an acre, not too fancy a
neighborhood?

And I see here that you'll be out of a job in 16 months or so. What
will you do then? Open a library. In Little Rock. Arkansas. Wow. I bet that will be some kind of moneymaker.

Mrs. Clinton, you're running for Senate, right? Senators are paid
$130,000 a year-assuming, of course, she's elected-so even with your
pension you're still looking at a house in the $825,000 range. Maybe
nice center hall colonial where the schools aren't so good.

Mrs. Clinton, you haven't worked outside the house since 1991, correct?

But you did some volunteer work, I see. You came up with a plan to
overhaul the entire national health care system? I see. It flopped, in other words.

But I see you had several business ventures back in Arkansas. How about this Whitewater Development Corp.? It went bankrupt. And Madison
Guaranty? Bankrupt. And Castle Grande? Bankrupt, too. If you had gone
to Yale business school instead of Yale law, you could probably get your money back. Don't get upset. It was just a little joke. A little bad luck with the law, too, I see. Three of your business partners went to jail.

Maybe you could get your money back.

This is an embarrassing question, I know, but we have to ask because it does, after all, affect your ability to pay: Any problems in your
marriage? No? Fine.

Let's look at your assets: $1.5 million. Not bad. Yes,yes, Mr. Clinton, we're not forgetting your Mustang back in Little Rock. But-oh!--those
liabilities. You owe $5.5 million. That means you're $4 million in the hole. How do you expect to pay that off? You're hoping people will
donate to a special fund? So basically you're relying on the charity of strangers.

You also have some serious expenses. A kid at Stanford had got to be
setting you back $30,000 to $35,000 a year, probably more with the air fares. And she wants to go to medical school? Ouch!

And Mr. Clinton, there's a little matter of a $90,000 fine for lying in court. I guess that rules out putting your law degree to work. Say, how do we know you're not lying on you loan application? Good point. It would look a lot better if you were lying. Are there any other legal matters we should know about?

You say you're in the clear, Mr. Clinton, and the first lady is pretty much in the clear indictment- wise. What does that mean? You don't think-don't think-she's going to get hit with a perjury or obstruction of justice rap. But we're not totally sure, right? That means there's a remote possibility-note that I say remote"-that you could be trying to pay off a $1.76 million mortgage while making 12 cents an hour stitching mailbags for the feds, and he is trying to make a go of a library in Little Rock.

Let's review the situation. One of you is now unemployed and the other
one soon will be. You have these whopping great debts that you're
hoping someone is going to come along and pay. You have a financial history that can only be described as "checkered," plus a bunch of serious financial demands and ongoing legal problems. Your tangible assets seem to consist of an old Ford.

So, Congratulations! Welcome to the EZBreeZee family of
homeowners! You've got your mortgage!

Isn't that what happened when you applied for your mortgage? Don't all mortgage companies operate that way? Maybe you just got the wrong one.

Steve




To: Knighty Tin who wrote (67803)9/16/1999 4:26:00 PM
From: Cynic 2005  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 132070
 
FDX Corp (FDX) 38 1/4 -5 7/16: So what happened to that ecommerce boom? Either the upcoming UPS IPO is a screaming buy or we all have some questions to ask about ecommerce and its impact on the package delivery business. The ecommerce boom is theoretically fuelling a package delivery boom, as we all get overnight, 2-day, and 3-day shipments of books, CDs, PCs, apparel, even 40 lb bags of dog food! Yet if that's the case, how has FedEx only managed to record a 3% year/year increase in daily package volume? Either UPS and the US Postal Service are recording the vast majority of the ecommerce shipping boom, or ecommerce shipping increases are being offset by decreases in other business lines, or the ecommerce boom is not all it was thought to be. We don't have the answers, but those are the questions that we must ask after this morning's ugly earnings report from FDX. Not only did the company miss estimates for the quarter in reporting a Q1 net of $0.52 versus a First Call mean of $0.54, but the company also warned that if "lower U.S. domestic growth" continues, earnings for Q2 and the fiscal year will miss analysts' estimates. The company's woes would be less perplexing were they due entirely to higher oil prices or pricing pressures in the shipping business, but the biggest problem for FDX is simply weak growth in the number of packages being shipped domestically. It is plausible that what the Internet giveth, the Internet taketh away. In other words, the Internet has given FDX many more package shipments, but perhaps it has simultaneously reduced the need for overnight shipping of many letters and documents that can now be delivered electronically. Once again, we're only guessing here. But some important questions will need to be answered ahead of the expected UPS IPO in November. Q3 earnings for UPS should be reported next month, and will probably contain some important answers. If UPS package volume is strong, FDX is just an underperformer. If it's weak, then the strength of the ecommerce boom -- or at least the strength of its impact on package delivery -- has to be questioned. - GJ