Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IATV-ACTV Digital Convergence Software-HyperTV -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ed doell who wrote (6639)	9/17/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: gpphantom	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13157

CNBC to talk about interactive TV next -

To: ed doell who wrote (6639)	9/17/1999 2:09:00 PM
From: Phil M	Respond to of 13157

Mike/ED, I understand that individuals sell a stock for different reasons. It just surprises me that someone would sell this stock AT ALL. I am sitting here trying to accumulate as much as possible and others are selling. And now Steve Harmon is reluctantly acknowledging our "superior market advantage." I remember his previous generic comments on thje SI board. It is a very good time to be in this stock. The future will be very exciting and rewarding! PHILM

To: ed doell who wrote (6639)	9/17/1999 3:49:00 PM
From: Mike Fredericks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13157

Regarding detecting whether or not Tudor is selling: Impossible to know for sure before the mandatory filing. They disguise their selling behind several MMs. And I believe that once they fall below the mandated % they fall off the monitoring screen altogether Again, I believe it was the Athiest who gave the original statement that he knew for almost certain Tudor was selling, and then it was confirmed by the filing - he said he knew Tudor was selling because they use a specific MM and that MM was always selling stock but never buying. Take that with a grain of salt; I was very skeptical initially when Atheist made his original statement, but Art supported him wholeheartedly. Art gave his typical "shut up Mike" comment when I questioned Atheist when Atheist had claimed Tudor was buying again (this was before the runup to 14-16). My position is who the heck cares about Tudor, he's only one buyer/seller. We can't blame any negative action on Tudor selling nor can we attribute any increase and optimism to "Tudor must be buying again, thus there is some good news we don't know about." All we can do is, when the filing comes out, use hindsight to try to explain why certain events happened. -Mike