Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marc chatman who wrote (51309)	9/17/1999 2:58:00 PM
From: marc chatman	Respond to of 95453

Baker Hughes N.A. rig count looks like its up 19, if I'm reading it right. bakerhughes.com

To: marc chatman who wrote (51309)	9/17/1999 6:19:00 PM
From: diana g	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 95453

Re: RIG Move Tax Implications Thanks marc. I did email RIG, but as yet have received no reply. Perhaps they're laughing at my email and saying "We're a Cayman Islands Company now, and the IRS is Not our problem no more, missy!!" I posted on the tax thread as you suggested. Why am I the only one wanting to get this straight? Granted, RIG stock is over $5, and the market cap is larger than that of UJDLB (Uncle Jimmy's Drilling and Live Bait), so RIG is not the kind of company usually talked about here. --But there must be somebody besides me still around who buys and holds these old going-nowhere dinosaurs long enough to be concerned about this tax issue. thanks again, regards, diana