Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : To be a Liberal,you have to believe that..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DJB who wrote (2821)	9/17/1999 9:58:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6418

Actually I wasn't referring to the Texas shooting. I agree that the guy was clearly a crackpot and have already posted that sentiment. Take a pill. JLA

To: DJB who wrote (2821)	9/17/1999 10:04:00 AM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6418

Dennis, to suggest those positions represent "hate" is a gross distortion. Do you always perceive people who disagree with gay causes and desires to change laws as being filled with hate? Nice "smear tactic" Dennis. Using emotionally charged language may work to garner "group think" in the halls of PFLAG but I doubt will influence any thinking here. Now I understand why you post "erase hate" in everyone of your posts. In other words, your try and plant the image that anyone who disagrees with you is filled with "hate". Where did you get that technique from Dennis, the "Gay handbook"? Michael

To: DJB who wrote (2821)	9/17/1999 10:10:00 AM
From: Null Dog Ago	Respond to of 6418

Just for the record, DJB, I still think the term "hate crime" is silly. Not trying to read minds or anything, but I think they're trying to say the title "hate crime" is a PC term which is discriminatory of the right. I don't think they support it because of this incident, but that's just what I'm reading into these posts.

To: DJB who wrote (2821)	9/17/1999 10:26:00 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6418

<<Name one liberal group that condones violence against religions of any kind.>> Name one religious group that condones violence against liberals of any kind. Your analysis smacks of a defensiveness which confirms the original point.