SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ish who wrote (60272)9/17/1999 9:58:00 AM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Democrats Decree Tougher Warning Labels:
Warning Labels to be Written at a 1st Grade Level

WASHINGTON, DC - Congress is set to pass a bill that would require all warning labels to be written at a 1st Grade Level. Said Congresswoman, Sheila Jackson Lee, "This bill is necessary because an increasing number of Americans, especially recent High School graduates, are not capable of reading current warning labels."

Difficult, multisllyabic words currently dominate the warning label market. They contain words such as; hazardous, flammable, combustible, explosive, corrosive, solvent, immediate, ingest, nausea, irritation, and exposure.

The new bill would require all warning labels to use short, single syllable words. One Congressman even suggested requiring the labels to use first grade reading primer characters, Dick and Jane.

Some examples of warning label verbiage after the bill takes effect would be, "See Dick drink. See Dick get sick. See Dick Die" or "See Jane light a match. See bottle go boom. See Jane catch fire. See Jane die."

Congress is excited about this bill and hopes that it will help make our country an even safer place to live.

President Clinton has already said that he will sign the legislation.



To: Ish who wrote (60272)9/17/1999 10:03:00 AM
From: Les H  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
Attacks on Serbs were ineffective, so what won the war?

usnews.com



To: Ish who wrote (60272)9/17/1999 10:25:00 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Try this:

stratfor.com