SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DownSouth who wrote (1458)9/22/1999 9:51:00 PM
From: riposte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10934
 
Jubak keeps NTAP...sets $84 Target by 12/1999

Just trolling around Jubak's column @ MoneyCentral Investor, and came across the following:

[TEXT DELETED]

Last week, Network Appliance (NTAP) moved strongly through the
$72.20 target price I set for the stock when I added it to Jubak's Picks
on May 4, 1999. The stock is up about 64% since I recommended it
at $46.75 a share. But even though this market makes me nervous, I
think the risk/reward tradeoff still comes down on the side of holding
onto Network Appliance. The price momentum on the stock remains
strong and a mid-quarter check by analysts at Merrill Lynch and
Prudential suggests that fundamental momentum is improving. (No
mean trick for a company that grew revenue 80% in the quarter that
ended in July over the same quarter of 1998.) After meeting with
management, Merrill's Steven Milunovich, for example, reported on
Sept. 14 that growth may be accelerating at the company and that
Network Appliance has a chance to beat Merrill's projected 65%
revenue growth target for fiscal 2000. I'm keeping Network Appliance
in Jubak's Picks and setting a new target price for the stock of $84 by
December 1999.

[REMAINING TEXT DELETED]

FULL ARTICLE @:
moneycentral.msn.com



To: DownSouth who wrote (1458)9/24/1999 4:32:00 PM
From: kas1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10934
 
All, this is a mostly bullish NTAP article from WallStreetCity. Obviously, I can't vouch for it and read at your own risk.

wallstreetcity.com