SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : How To Write Covered Calls - An Ongoing Real Case Study! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Herm who wrote (11537)9/17/1999 4:02:00 PM
From: RDHickman  Respond to of 14162
 
Herm!

...and make sure you place enter at the end of each sentence line.

Wow! All this time (for many months) I missed the enter "Enter"!!!!!

Thanks!!!! /Dick



To: Herm who wrote (11537)9/17/1999 7:50:00 PM
From: Mike T.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14162
 
Herm,

I've been using WIN's on IFMX for the past few months, and it's been very effective. I like this company and this stock, and have been monitoring the charts several times a week. I'm noticing a great deal of volume lately, along with some acquisitions the company's made.

My nut this round (I got called out last time for a very nice profit) is 7.00 (I hold 1500 shares long). I've waited until now to sell some calls, and decided on the Oct. 7.5's for a cool 1.50. If the stock keeps going up, I still make a nice 28% profit over just about two months. I thought about the Nov. and Jan 7.5's, but I'm not sure how long this support is going to last (RSI is nearly 69 on the daily chart), and I hate giving up the ability to move on a stock.

If you have any additional info on IFMX, it would be most appreciated. I know you prefer writing out more months, but I don't want to miss any swings on this stock (obviously, that could work against me if I sell too short-term). I've been using your WIN's approach for the past year plus, and have done pretty well with it, though am still learning chart reading, etc.

Thanks,

Mike