Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hank who wrote (3672)	9/17/1999 2:21:00 PM
From: Kelly	Respond to of 10293

as a long-time lurker, i agree wholeheartedly. i don't give a crap about gumm, have no position, and have no interest in initiating one on either side. please, let's discuss something else. kelly

To: Hank who wrote (3672)	9/17/1999 3:16:00 PM
From: Dale Baker	Respond to of 10293

Ditto. Hearing the same points rehashed for the 675th time is a waste of everyone's time. The GUMM thread awaits you gentlemen. There is nothing you can say here that hasn't been repeated ad nauseum. Point made, OK?

To: Hank who wrote (3672)	9/17/1999 3:29:00 PM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Where would you guys be if you couldn't call people names. Perhaps you haven't heard what is being said to you. Stop referring to GUMM and you won't hear from the longs. We didn't know you were alive before Wexler's prognostication and we still don't care if you are. If you defame the company falsely then you will continue to hear from us. I guarantee it. No need to respond to this message.

To: Hank who wrote (3672)	9/18/1999 9:26:00 PM
From: Pallisard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

< Why? Because you know that there are more people reading this thread than actually post here. Because you know that there are more people reading this thread than the GUMM thread. You and your merry band of actors are playing to the silent onlookers with all your might. > Gee Hank, why the intensity? Bill Wexler told me on the Valence thread months ago that these internet posts didn't influence anyone enough to change anything. Do you disagree?