Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GoNorth who wrote (35357)	9/17/1999 3:54:00 PM
From: re3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37507

well, go , you never know with this stock... anything is possible... i presume you are short ??? you should tell the thread if you are... i think so anyways... i noted some sort of consortium in the us re auctions, etc...wonder how this will impact bids... your burn rate term is interesting ...i forgot that term, but it is important...payrolls must be met , yada yada...net stocks are like biotechs...if they aren't careful, the kitty depletes, and thats that... how much cash does bids have per share now /??

To: GoNorth who wrote (35357)	9/17/1999 4:14:00 PM
From: buffet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37507

Wrong again, old boy. Your "vast experience" isn't helping much.

To: GoNorth who wrote (35357)	9/18/1999 5:03:00 AM
From: WhatsUpWithThat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37507

GN, you never responded to my question: Anyway, I did a search some time back for the string "call" on this thread and found almost nothing from you. Where were your calls posted, GN? I just did a search for the string "call" again tonight, and the only call you made in all the posts returned - aside from the one for today, where BII was flat and BIDS was down 1/32 - was on July 26 for the 27th...when BII was up a dime and BIDS was up 1/32. Which leaves you looking somewhat less than a "Master of the Call": you're less than 1 for 2, bud. All the other references from you were posts taunting others to make calls or bragging about how you're the Master of the Call, how you have a 95% accuracy, etc. But you can't back it up. Remember my little bit of math? You'd have to have at least 13/14 calls, allowing for generous rounding to the nearest 5%, to get your claimed 95% accuracy. Refer us to 14 of your calls, 14 in total, right or wrong, let's take a look at them together, the whole thread. As Mark Twain once said, "There are three kinds of liars: Liars, damn liars, and statisticians." From the evidence we have so far, it seems at least you're definitely not the latter, GN... WUWT