SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pompsander who wrote (29798)9/17/1999 11:02:00 PM
From: Dan3  Respond to of 93625
 
Re: AMD would be more successful if it offered every choice...

Let's see, AMD offered a limited quantity of the Irongate chipset to get Athlon off the ground and has been encouraging the chipset makers to design whatever they think will offer us, the customers the best combination of price and performance. So, for the Athlon, we have PC100 SDRAM being supported, PC 133, VC DRAM, DDR DRAM, ES DRAM, someday - if it ever looks like it makes any sense - DRDRAM. All with AMD's encouragement.

Meanwhile Intel has sued VIA for shipping a PC133 chipset!

Sued them for offering a performance improvement!

Sued them for trying to place a competitive technology into the marketplace!

Intel sued VIA for not going to DRDRAM as they were told to.

KZNerd's bootheel comment is an accurate description of what is going on.

Dan



To: pompsander who wrote (29798)9/18/1999 12:39:00 AM
From: grok  Respond to of 93625
 
RE: <Dave: using KZNerd's logic, AMD would be more successful if it offered every choice available. >

Nope. None of that. Wrong argument. Don't care about any of that.

I think you all started off on the wrong track when Dave B vectored through an undefined interrupt vector.