SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41754)9/18/1999 9:36:00 AM
From: Cosmo Daisey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Dr. Willie,
"""my momentum swing target is 225
real simple rationale that has come thru in a few past situations
195 to 165 back up to 225 it could go higher""

My next leg is @ 212
cdaisey@heliopause.com




To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41754)9/18/1999 10:41:00 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
Jim...Anyone.....comments...?........Did Bull Market Die On Wall Street?

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A curious thing has happened. The bull market died
in the spring of 1998 but Wall Street still hasn't been told at least that's what
some experts say.

The headline-grabbing stock market indices the Dow Jones industrials,
Standard & Poor's 500 and Nasdaq composite may be cruising at record
highs, but the truth is that many stocks have not kept up.

In fact, a big number of stocks are below the highs made in the rip-roaring
days of the 1997 and 1998 bull market.

``The overall market has been in a bear market since April 1998. Yes, that is
right 1998,' said Don Hays, chief investment strategist for Wheat First Union
in Richmond, Va.

It's a smoke-and-mirrors market.

``With only four technology stocks making up 25 percent of the weighting of
the Nasdaq and the media only concentrating on the indices, the 'Stealth
Bear Market' is being ignored,' he said.

``What do you think the headlines would be saying if the major indices were
19.7 percent under the mid-April 1998 highs?' he asked.

The experts backed up their words with some strong stuff.

Ned Davis Research in Venice, Fla., says the average stock in its
7,736-stock data base has fallen nearly 20 percent since April 1998 a virtual
bear market for a large number of stocks.

There's more.

Richard McCabe, chief market analyst for Merrill Lynch, found that 23.6
percent of the New York Stock Exchange's common stocks and 22.7 percent
of the Nasdaq market's stocks are below their summer-fall 1998 lows.

``The uptrend in the major market indices is misleading because it does not
represent what the majority of stocks have been doing,' he said.

People have been buying the big-name stocks, such as technology and
consumer growth companies, in the hopes that the sectors would stand up to
the downward pressures on earnings from the economic problems in Asia and
Latin America as well as the slowdown in Europe.

``Investors went for the rapid and proven growth companies and ignored the
medium and small stocks, which have been underperforming for more than a
year,' McCabe said.

``It's created a new breed of 'Nifty Fifty' the group of stocks that did well in the
early 1970s when the rest of the market was having trouble,' he said.

The Nifty Fifty stocks eventually went through a nasty period and they joined
the bear market that had been dogging the other stocks since the late '60s.

Was it the smart way to pick stocks?

``It was not the ideal investment,' he said. ``A good, steady and healthy
market is usually one where the vast array of stocks are doing well. But,
when it's a narrow advancing market, the risk is the majority of weak stocks
will ultimately bring down the minority of strong stocks.'

Some investors may be reacting to the warning signs.

The emotional intensity of the bulls has tapered off over the past few weeks.
The proof: The rallies have not generated a lot of new buying interest.

Also, mutual fund investors have reduced their stock holdings at the fastest
pace since December 1987. Back then, investors were still running for the
exits after the October crash.

The downsizing of stock portfolios started this summer. In July, investors
redeemed shares from mutual fund companies at an annual rate of more than
20 percent, according to the Investment Company Institute, a
Washington-based mutual fund lobbying group.

And, at the end of July, Fidelity Investment's Magellan Fund, the nation's
biggest mutual fund with assets of more than $100 billion, cut its stock
holdings to the lowest level in three years at 92.2 percent.

``A reasonable case can be made that what has been occurring
simultaneously over the last 16 months is a bull market in a minority of
large-cap issues and a bear market in a majority of mid- to small caps,'
McCabe said.

Has the bull market been built on shaky ground?

``There is little doubt, even in those partying 'tunnel vision' minds, that this
bull market is being carried by a small pocket of stocks mostly big-cap
technology stocks,' Hays said.

The good times have been rolling for the tech sector, which includes
International Business Machines Corp., Intel Corp., Microsoft Corp., among
others. In fact, the technology sector has jumped 32 percent so far this year,
after soaring 72 percent in 1998.

And, while the overall market was off 1 percent in August, the tech sector
climbed nearly 6 percent, which explains why the market, on the surface,
appears to be in a bull mode.

During the days of the Nifty Fifty, investors concentrated on a select group of
stocks with extraordinarily high price-earnings ratios of 40 to 80.

``Their philosophy was to find stocks that had been able to provide consistent
annual earnings gains, with the statement that you could buy these stocks at
any price and know that in the future, you would be bailed out because of
those persistent growth patterns,' Hays said.

How different are things from the 1970s?

Cisco sells at 70 times projected earnings and Microsoft is at 60 times future
earnings.

Hays said tech stocks now make up a huge 24 percent of the Standard &
Poor's market capitalization, which is up from 13 percent in 1997. In 1990, it
was just 7 percent.

Technology stocks, particularly the Internet group, are in a new era and for
that reason, Wall Street has no idea where the P/E limits should be for many
of those companies.

After all, the limits of a stock's P/E are largely decided by investors'
expectations of earnings growth and risk. In the case of the Internet stocks,
the sky seems to be the limit.

America Online is selling at 200 times expected 12-month earnings.

``We believe the next two months will be very chaotic and take those
perpetual grins off those who think the bull market is still alive,' Hays said.

McCabe said the market sell-off could take place in October.

``It has the reputation of being a 'crash' month for stocks but October is also
known as a 'bottoming' period because market weakness often sets the
foundation for recoveries,' he said.

``Then, there's the Y2K computer problem, which may provide the market with
an excuse for a setback in the big-cap stocks as we get nearer to the end of
the year,' he said.

McCabe sees a correction in the Dow of 10 to 15 percent.

For the week, the Dow Jones industrial average fell 224.80 points, the Nasdaq
composite index slipped 17.44 points, and the Standard & Poor's 500 index
dropped 16.23 points.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41754)9/18/1999 12:21:00 PM
From: w molloy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
TA Challenge :

Zero serious responses to the challenge. Well, thats hardly
surprising since TA really is hocus pocus.

Consider Jim 'little weiner' Willies last pertinent post


GC and JohnG, how much trouble do you expect QCOM to have in working thru the 200 level?

interested in your perspective?
I think a couple minor rebuffs
may find some temporary resistance at 193 and 198, more so at 193 since it marked a close two
weeks ago

my momentum swing target is 225
real simple rationale that has come thru in a few past situations
195 to 165 back up to 225
it could go higher

what do you think?


These statements are utterly meaningless without a time frame. 'little weiners' gonads are so shrivelled he even has to generalise
with a defensive 'it could go higher' statement.

Weiners less than polite posts yesterday refered to TA as an 'artful science'. What is that? Science involves forming a hypothesis, building a model and testing that model against experimental observations. I guess weiner thinks that making science artful dispenses with the need for testing.

TA is toast.

w.

PS Weiner - I'd appreciate you posting your mails to me in the public
forum. I'm sure you would want to share your devastating wit with a wider audience.

PPS
You know FA about engineering. Did you know that there is a strong
correlation between outstanding engineering talent and music?

So much for your left brain right brain conjectures.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41754)9/18/1999 12:43:00 PM
From: JohnG  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
JimWillie. On TA and 120 level. It shouldn't really matter to me because I am holding long on fundamentals and not trading. Also, the stock is somewhat news driven, option driven and possibly October effect driven. I wold expect an upward march with a likely dip the week of the Friday Oct 18 options expiration (a boat load of low strike oftions expire). The stock should take some direction a week or so prior to the 11/3 earnings report date. If and when the sale/JV of the subscriber division is announced, it may take some upward direction, especially if at appears that this will hasten/enable adoption of CDMA in Europe or at AT&T.
If NASDQ falls in Oct, then QCOM will likely see its pos movement stalled.
As far as price acton, I guess, absent the above effects, I see a fairly steady rise to $200, followed by a 30 point dip back toward 180/190.
But, I remind you that Warren Buffet purchases stocks based on fundamentals and pays little attention to market price action as long as the fundamentals remain solid.
Also, because you have read the Gorrila Game, I remind you that they advise that, for a gorilla stock (can we agree on this) fundamentals change slowly so you need only review the stock quarterly when earnings come out.
I am interested in dips though, because my available margin keeps increasing and I prefer to invest in Q on a dip--knowing though that if I miss the dip, it won't make too much difference in the long run if the stock continuse to grow at 50%/yr. The real mistake would be to become so facinated by TA and price action that you fail to invest at all.
Also, a more interesting question for you so spend your time on would be that of whether leaps are still a good investment. This is, how long can Q achieve this rapid growth rate and what are the limits on its growth. As I said many times, I think that this is a share accumulation stock--not a trading stock. Thus we do better if we take the eagles eye view. Energy spent watching the grass wave in the breeze is essentially wasted for me, although it is fun and exciting to follow the play-by-play and by doing so make myself a part of this powerful CDMA adoption drama.
JohnG



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41754)9/18/1999 1:05:00 PM
From: JohnG  Respond to of 152472
 
JimWillie. So the upward march has begun again.
iqc.com
JohnG



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (41754)9/20/1999 2:17:00 PM
From: gc  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Jim, the minor correction of this morning makes your prediction of 225 more achievable near term. My chart agrees with you. I am holding until 225.