Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ibexx who wrote (41767)	9/18/1999 10:29:00 PM
From: Cosmo Daisey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Ibexx, In a rational market about a month (21 days) but I think the handset sale could have the same effect as the ERICY deal did. I expect Phillips to be the buyer. Also a split is likely and any announcement will set Q* on fire. I almost never try to predict a top because I follow the rules set forth in "Zen in the Market" by Eddie Toppel and predictions aren't necessary. samauritrader.com cdaisey@

To: Ibexx who wrote (41767)	9/18/1999 11:13:00 PM
From: 007	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Need help with a question. If we have 160000 shares outstanding and at the annual meeting we will be voting to increase this to 300000 how can we split 2 for one. So if we assume what some say that we have 150000 outstanding, and we approve 300000 shares we are ok for one split, but are we sitting in a situation that we would have to wait for another annual meeting to vote on more shares. With the stock at 200 a split would put us at 100 with well over a year before we could vote on another split. Any thoughts on this. I am sure some of you have a better feel about this then I do. Not that splits matter much, but I couldn't help but think why didn't they want to vote on more shares to be available. M. Solum