Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: taxman who wrote (29723)	9/18/1999 6:37:00 PM
From: ed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

It really did not matter who paid for the ads, what is matter is Microsoft paid the ads so that people can show their opinions to the public.If Microsoft did not pay for the ads, then people can't show their opinion to the public, because people can't afford the ads. That is the real value of democracy. All people always had the chance to show their opinions to the public, equal opportunity, being poor or rich. Unfortunatelly, nowadays, if you want to show your opinions, you have to pay for it , the payment of ADS. So, not everyone has equal right to show his opinions on the public . My point is , Microsoft had done the right thing to pay for the ads, so that people had equal right to show their opinions about the DOJ case in public. What is wrong with it ?