SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Xpiderman who wrote (72246)9/18/1999 7:28:00 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 1572107
 
Re: "AMD is AMD, the loser AMD, and it will report another record loss in Q3, and the CEO Sanders will make you believe next quarter and next year it will be different... "

You forgot to mention that they will once again buy that worn out story hook line and sinker.... It works every time Jerry uses it so why stop now?

EP



To: Xpiderman who wrote (72246)9/18/1999 8:04:00 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572107
 
RE <<<>>Microsoft had the same problem a few years back... it did not hurt Windows sales. When you have a good product, superior to all others<<

Are you comparing AMD to Microsoft? And why would you compare ASSLon to Windows?!

FYI, Windows (3.1, 95, 98 and NT) sells not because it's a "superior" product, it's because its monopoly position in the market place. In the microprocessor business, don't you realize only Intel is qualified to compare to Microsoft? (BTW, I am very happy share holder of MSFT and INTC )>>>

Normally I don't post to someone with a one letter tag.....it reminds me of the backwoods especially when that letter is a big X. However in this case I will make an exception so that I can point out that I was careful to refer to Windows as superior to all others and not as you assumed, a superior product....if you doubt that, just look to the top of this post. And since there is very little competition currently for Windows, I think it is safe to say that it is superior to all others. If you do not agree with that statement, then why are you long the stock?

As for the rest of your post, it is typical of an *sshole, sorry of an intc long and is not worth the time to respond.

ted



To: Xpiderman who wrote (72246)9/18/1999 9:37:00 PM
From: Mani1  Respond to of 1572107
 
I sure hope this post is not indicative of your future posts if any.

Mani