Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: OB who wrote (1938)	9/19/1999 11:53:00 AM
From: taxgun	Respond to of 2891

In case you missed thomas's profile webtrips.com

To: OB who wrote (1938)	9/19/1999 4:50:00 PM
From: Noneyet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2891

OB First off, if you take out usat's business and the Bosnia money you have revenues of 1,551,000 left. Last year's fcm's revenues were $ 1,377,000. What would you like to tell me that somehow usat is a reputable company. No one to date has been able to figure out where they received any money from to pay fcm. Evidently that is accurate from this last fcm filing in which usat owes fcm $ 2,400,000. Better than that is how does fcm make a statement like the one they made on June 18, claiming that usat had ordered 1000 breezes. What happened didn't fcm know on June 18 that usat was not able to pay them. So what is that garbage press release about, they also claim that the breeze was to begin shipping in September, well now they are claiming the breeze will ship by the end of the year, which is it, huh. WHAT WAS THAT PRESS RELEASE FOR, EITHER YOU ARE ABLE TO SHIP WHEN YOU SAY OR YOU ARE NOT, THIS IS A PUBLIC CORPORATION NOT PRIVATE. You ask to compare fcm to Clarent or Gnet, well I suggest to you one look at their customers / financial backers and the company's SEC documents and the comparison will end immediately. There simply is no comparing these companies, and that statement is absurd.