SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RockyBalboa who wrote (3741)9/19/1999 11:24:00 AM
From: DanZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
InfoStream,

You're right. I didn't see that you were addressing Mike calling Wexler a fraud. However, my logic stands because others have condoned Bill's calling companies a fraud on the basis of the two points in my post. Bill himself used that logic yesterday.

The thread that Mad2 created is one of his stupider ideas. I have already said that if you all want to move this discussion to the GUMM thread, then post your comments there. I normally reply to messages on the thread where they are initiated. You all can't have unbridled rights to bash GUMM here.

Regards,
Dan



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (3741)9/19/1999 3:44:00 PM
From: Mike M  Respond to of 10293
 
You say that you are open but, in fact, your response to Dan's post shows you aren't....

Wexler hasn't proven fraud. Not even close. He uses the term loosely, w/out knowing anything about the company or its product. His three minute due diligence and limited intellect simply don't qualify him to make this determination.

GUMM has not been a big promoter of its stock. Since Kehoe it hasn't promoted it at all. Maybe we shareholders are too exuberant...Time will tell, but we don't think so.

Because I know GUMM is not a self promoter and I know that the product works, what else can I believe from a self promoter like Wexler who is willing to make false claims about a company he knows almost nothing about....He is the fraud.