Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : SI Spammer Hall of Fame -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cisco who wrote (897)	9/19/1999 2:45:00 PM
From: keith massey	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4105

Cisco Good ideas about turning them over to the SEC, but then we all need to worry about what is considered spamming. I have mentioned stocks I have held on other threads (2-3 in a day once in a blue moon) but am fairly sure I wasn't spamming but giving friendly heads up to people I know and talk with regularly....what makes the difference. Those paying for lifetime memberships may not like their posting limited that much for the amount they pay. 5 post a day until 50 post won't kill anyone. As long as SI explains that this is to keep away spammers I don't think they will get any arguments. If the three that had caused the problem earlier last week had been limited to 5 posts, their spamming might have been more effective. I really can't think of any way to control someone putting up 5 posts. Best Regards KEITH