Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Soileau who wrote (10088)	9/19/1999 4:39:00 PM
From: tanoose	Respond to of 10836

Hello John; If you think I have given advice to buy on this forum so be it, it is your opinion, you are entitled to it?? If you accuse, please make my day?? You wrote?? "I had enough "conception" to stay away???" Hmmm now that is interesting, there were plenty who had the perception to make a good amount of cash in this play, long or short, so in this case you have no perception as to how to play then?? "Haven't there been posts saying this all the way down from the stock's peak??? Could such posts be read as a bearish indicator???????????" They could be taken in more than one way, at the moment the reality says there is a lot of change politically speaking occurring in Venezuela, plenty of turmoil??..............and if past history is a good indicator, where there is turmoil there is always opportunity's to profit?? Tell ya what John, take a step back, and forget about the past two years or whatever, I think it is much longer than that?? and figure out a way of playing KRY and you will do OK with it?? If you don't want to believe me ask shortee?? With regards, Frank

To: John Soileau who wrote (10088)	9/19/1999 4:48:00 PM
From: Syncrude	Respond to of 10836

John, I went to see post 4781 and yet again, I fail to see Frank making a buy recommendation/suggestion? Where is that buy recommendation at $11 ???? Geez, I guess people see what they want to see??? As Marcos has kindly stated, if more attention was made to the POST rather than POSTERS and if more focus was given to facts, it would make for more meaningful exchange??? Is it not weird that Frank and me are NOT the most vocal and wildly enthusiastic advocates for a pro position on Crystallex, yet we bear the brunt of the most silly accusations??? Now if people want to exchange points of view both pro and con, let's do so, keeping in mind of course, that Crystallex is a highly speculative stock. PS. About the use of ?. We get bonus points for each ? we use. Can't tell you the source though, it is yet another secret??? LOL.