Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (11404)	9/19/1999 8:56:00 PM
From: Jafco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed, that's not fair--you took my price and I said last January that "gippys time is '99" and the price would be $5--since you beat me to the draw, I'll take $4 15/16 . Happy trading Joe

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (11404)	9/19/1999 9:08:00 PM
From: JACK R. SMITH JR.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed, Most defunct stocks strangely trade at $.001 for a while. I have owned at least one. Regards, Jack! P.S.-- There is also a limited time in which you can take a tax loss!!

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (11404)	9/19/1999 9:37:00 PM
From: Scott Wheeler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

<< I insist on two bides[sic], one for myself and one for my wife >> Done. $0.03 (I think that's what you said - I didn't recognize the symbol: 3¢ ] for the missus and a fiver for Mr. EF. << There will be no middle >> In principle I agree with this. However, it may be that $5 could actually represent a middle number, when one gets to thinking about it. When production is in full swing, there will be people bragging that they bought it for $5, IMO.