SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Jackson who wrote (72377)9/19/1999 9:08:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573102
 
Re: "What I cannot understand is why they did not have two horses running. They could have had a skunkworks project as a fallback if Rambus choked, they could easily afford it and control leaks."

Having the money doesn't solve all the problems. You still need to staff and that takes time, even if you can find the personnel.

EP



To: Bill Jackson who wrote (72377)9/19/1999 9:15:00 PM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573102
 
Bill,

Re"Intelbackup"

I believe the new Intel 810e will be able to work with PC133.

They will not release it as such.

I look for the PC133 support in Q1 2000.

I suspect the Intel management is doing the right thing.

Giving Rambus FULL support for Q4 but if market doesn't like it they will relegate it as just another option for coppermine by Q1 2000.

Regards,

Kash



To: Bill Jackson who wrote (72377)9/19/1999 9:20:00 PM
From: grok  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573102
 
RE: <What I cannot understand is why they did not have two horses running. They could have had a skunkworks project as a fallback if Rambus choked, they could easily afford it and control leaks. Instead it looks as if they placed all eggs in one basket and have only recently started the second horse running from way back. Bill>

Gee, I wish I had said that.