Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Net Shepherd Inc. (WEB) on ASE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Crazy Canuck who wrote (397)	9/19/1999 11:42:00 PM
From: Spark	Respond to of 1252

NasdaQ.....!!!

To: Crazy Canuck who wrote (397)	9/19/1999 11:52:00 PM
From: Barry K	Respond to of 1252

Hi CC, I too have been quiet for a while now, waiting to hear the results of their acceptance testing. A week or two ago I sent Peter Hunt an e-mail to inquire about the status. He left me a voice mail this week while I was travelling, which confirmed each of the items in your posting. The next step is to get some contracts signed and generate some revenue. I sure would like to see a few big announcements regarding this in the short term. Regards, Barry

To: Crazy Canuck who wrote (397)	9/20/1999 9:56:00 PM
From: Boolish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1252

Thanks for keeping us up to date on your talks with the company. It's great to hear how they are progressing with their plans. BTW That said, I still hold all of my shares (last count 22 purchases, and only 1 sell - the sell was my fourth transaction out of the 22). What I'd give to be your broker...LOL

To: Crazy Canuck who wrote (397)	9/22/1999 10:51:00 PM
From: Mike Perras	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1252

CC, I have to relate a recent Dunn & Bradstreet story, as I remember you mentioned that Net Shepherd had done a test of their service with them. I got a call from Dunn & Bradstreet at the office yesterday, well that certainly peaked my interest. They were just updating their database & wanted an update on our company profile. I don't know where they culled their information on our company from or who they were doing this research for but I have to tell you of the 20 questions they asked, they had 15 of 20 pieces of data wrong & I had to correct staff names, fax numbers, proper corporate spelling of the company name etc All very basic information & 75% inaccurate. This must be a huge expense to them & thus their client as we spoke for at least 15 minutes & we are only one company. At that rate it would take a person a full day to complete only 28 companies. Something is very wrong with the current process to have to do everything twice, get the initial info & then call every company to verify the accuracy of said information. To protect their own credibility, calling the companies is a good thing, especially seeing as the information was totally wrong. Now as I remember, Net Shepherd could easily play a role in making this process more efficient and considerably cheaper as well. Appreciate any thoughts on this matter. Cheers, Mike