SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (72414)9/20/1999 12:01:00 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572371
 
RE <<<That's Clinton-speak for " I WAS COMPLETELY WRONG "

Yep.

You sho' 'nuf was !>>>

No, those are my words for saying that predicting the direction of a stock is difficult to do due to all the variables involved. Having said that, I believe that intc's 60% increase was 'manufactured' by the analysts and assisted by the expected increase in chip sales in the second half.

And I thought intc would get away with it but that may not happen...intc keeps slipping from its new high. But don't worry your shares are still worth a lot.....they just may not be going anywhere.

ted



To: Paul Engel who wrote (72414)9/20/1999 3:31:00 PM
From: Yousef  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572371
 
Paul,

Re: "That's Clinton-speak for " I (thejerk) WAS COMPLETELY WRONG "

Yep.

You sho' 'nuf was !"

Now thejerk comes back with this -->

"No, those are my words for saying that predicting the direction of a
stock is difficult to do due to all the variables involved."


Just like "Clinton", thejerk is having a hard time with the "facts" ... or ...
as Mark Twain would say "He was just being "stingy" with the truth". <ggg>

Make It So,
Yousef