Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Hermann who wrote (19980)	9/20/1999 1:29:00 AM
From: Troll_29	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25814

Silver is better with respect to everything but cost I thought.

To: Mike Hermann who wrote (19980)	9/20/1999 12:12:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25814

Mike, What about gold, is anybody looking at that, isn't that the obvious next step after Cu? electrical conductivity: silver > copper > gold > aluminum > magnesium > zinc > iron > tin > chromium > lead. Copper is "it". Gold is not as good a conductor and, since it is highly desired by people (mostly women?) for some reason, ;-), its price has been driven sky high since biblical times, or earlier. Silver, as Patrick points out, has serious migration problems. In layman terms, it goes everywhere and shorts out everything. Your chips would end up useful for not much more than as a fuse. Copper, I understand, is tricky and can contaminate in processes where the process people don't know what they are doing yet. It is, according to IBM (and MOT?) handle-able if you do it right. For reference, Intel is going to do copper along with their 0.13 micron process, which should be in a year and a half or so. They are just getting into 0.18 right now, and their upcoming, this month-next month Coppermine chips will be in 0.18 (but not in copper, they selected the code name quite a while ago and didn't think about the name confusion, apparently.). I do like Wilf's philosophy of not trying to be first in a lot of the technology pushes, like copper and 300 mm. Let someone else take the risk first. LSI's value is in their ASIC, SOAC, coreware, etc. innovations. Tony