SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : time travel -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nate who wrote (23)9/20/1999 10:25:00 AM
From: Nate  Read Replies (8) | Respond to of 69
 
ok, maybe it was titled wrong and i will appologize for that. but it is growing and i have enjoyed what i read. what would we do with time travel. would it become a tourist industry. i would love to go back and see some of the major events in our history. i would really like to know who shot kennedy. jmhooc.



To: Nate who wrote (23)9/20/1999 5:50:00 PM
From: C Kahn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69
 
Nate, I'm curious about this concept. I don't know very much about physics. Could you give me an example of this theory? does this have something to do with the "Lorentz contraction"?

the multiple time line theory allows sideways movement in time. the basis of it is that every possible outcome of an event does happen on a given time line but we choose which line we follow by our actions.



To: Nate who wrote (23)9/20/1999 8:19:00 PM
From: C Kahn  Respond to of 69
 
Nate, of course I realize that quantum theory and classical physics seem contradictory. Do you think that classical physics is accurate in the macroscopic world?



To: Nate who wrote (23)9/20/1999 9:13:00 PM
From: C Kahn  Respond to of 69
 
Nate, would you please elaborate on this?

the multiple time line theory allows sideways movement in time. the basis of it is that every possible outcome of an event does happen on a given time line but we choose which line we follow by our actions.



To: Nate who wrote (23)9/20/1999 9:15:00 PM
From: C Kahn  Respond to of 69
 
I'll settle for an equation if you don't care to discuss theories.