Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : WELCOME TO THE CATHOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ACAN who wrote (237)	9/20/1999 3:10:00 PM
From: ivan solotaroff	Respond to of 1065

CKR/LJPC Allan, Two interesting non-signals you've brought in: CKR is a breed I've never seen before, a double-Este-cat-gapper, meaning on two separate occasions, it gapped insufficiently to become a cat, but then finished out the day with a respectable cat-sized lump on their its and an outline of its physique in the glass roof of the cathouse, created as it plummeted from respectability into the House of the Falling Cat. "There is A cat In New Orleans ...." On the first try, early June, it gapped a respectable but not qualifying 16%, and finished the day down 23%; the most recent was a mere 7.8% gap, followed by a truly Este-qualifying gap-down day, close-to-close, of 29%. I've never seen it before, and won't touch it with Captain Kirk's ten-foot pole. LJPC is a feline very, very dear to my heart. I want to strangle every cent out of this little manx that I can. However: It failed to signal on 9/15, which qualified for a new low on significant volume, but not for the third reason: it closed 1/32 off the low; I don't know if that was the bid or the ask, but it's not enough in either case. Penny-cats are in my ears and in my eyes, to quoth Paul McC, but I really don't want them up my you-know-where, searching for my fiduciary Klingons. Hope that helps, or at least amuses, Ivan

To: ACAN who wrote (237)	9/20/1999 4:00:00 PM
From: ivan solotaroff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1065

OCR et SRV non dit MEOW, a cause de VOLUME (A headline for our friends across the waves, following La Maison des Chats from Paree.) They threw a nice little neck-tie party for these two beef-critters, but they forgot to invite enough people. I don't know how to translate neck-tie party or beef-critters for frogs. Just hope they're cineastes and have seen enough Westerns to know to stay away from these falling knives until the volume says, "YO!, Grenouille. Yeah, You, in the Green beret and the four legs I'm fixing to eat in wine sauce. Don't buy these stocks. They didn't signal."

To: ACAN who wrote (237)	9/21/1999 2:26:00 PM
From: ivan solotaroff	Respond to of 1065

catzvii IPO techstocks.com It thus joins esteemed brethren techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com techstocks.com And yet, on such a dismal, rainy post-Floyd day, not a single worthy signal emerges: RAD, SRV, and ORB had all the requirements, but they gapped into them this morning, thus earning themselves 15 days in Coventry. Little pricks. Particularly SRV, for which I've had what the French call "un Willie engorge" ever since it schnookered me into a commission loss, then snuck out of the house a few months ago "to get a pack of cigarettes" and did 80% or 90% or somesuch. Ivan