Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (11434)	9/20/1999 5:18:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed, my bias reflects reality. Fortunately (for me), I jumped out as soon as I noticed divergence between the "then" glowing FA and the poor TA (well above $2 and more than two years ago). I have yet to see the onion peeling process completion, and until that happens, my bias will remain negative from a fundamental point of view. I see the recent rally as nothing more than a touting supported rally (also known in some circles as P&D). This include, I understand an "i-net" campaign of whispers about an "imminent" great surprise, but frankly, I would be more happy with the company getting a simple water usage permit (as one of many indications of imminent production"), than this continuous string of releases indicating oodles of goodies in the ore, extracted every time by another wand of magic, whispers that production is "imminent" or already in progress, etc. As for George and Les, I really do not know them and their track records, nor their ability to differentiate between hype and fact. I am just sorry for the new harvest of, what in my opinion will be, bag holders created in this last rally. Zeev

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (11434)	9/20/1999 9:52:00 PM
From: JACK R. SMITH JR.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed, I understand Jensen, and I understand his problems here. I have no axe to grind with Jensen other than that he has not properly performed his fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders of this public company. Jensen seems to think that the company is in being for his personal benefit, and that simply is in error. The company is in being for the benefit of its shareholders. The sooner he realizes that and acts accordingly, the better the company will be. Without making actionable accusations, just let me say that the company management has poofed "unofficial" information to the maximum and made "extremely bungling public statements ad nauseum". The company has no public credibility, and simply hangs on by its seemingly decetiful activity. Frankly, If they got the chairman of the Federal Reserve to puff the stock, I would not buy it without concrete proof of valid refiner receipts. Excuse me, but since the process is solved, why can we not have what would make Jack, the GPGI crumudgeon extremely happy. Buy the way, what do you know about Jensen's efforts to get the company in full compliance with current reporting rules? Whe will we be relegated to the "pink sheets" due to the incompetence of our President? I understand Jensen's concern, but there is only one way out for him and that is through performing for his shareholders! That includes the large and the small. Credibility through production, profit, production, profit--actually very simple now that the process is solved! Let it happen in spades, Jack!!