Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (72600)	9/20/1999 10:58:00 PM
From: grok	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573384

RE: <he is formally correct about 400MHz> Ali, you are right. Tony, I apologize. The signals do not switch faster than 400 MHz.

To: Ali Chen who wrote (72600)	9/20/1999 11:30:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 1573384

Ali, Hey guys, although that visitor from Intelland is a complete moron, he is formally correct about 400MHz. It happens sometimes :) Just wondering, are you as personality challenged in person as you are on SI?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (72600)	9/20/1999 11:32:00 PM
From: Goutam	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573384

Ali, You are absolutely right about the data signal rate on the data bus at the max rate of 400MHZ, and the timing parameter requirements must be based on 800MHz rules. Today was my first time that I looked at the RAMBUS technology and failed to see that the data signals are not RZ or NRZ type (what do you call this type of signals? Return to next data? Am I correct in using the terms - RZ,NRZ?) Thanks for correcting me. My apologies to Tony. Regards, Goutama