SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: grok who wrote (72618)9/21/1999 12:22:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1573433
 
KZ, <The interesting question is: after they've done all that, does it work in mass production with a low failure rate? What do you think, Ali?>

First, almost anything can be done given unlimited
budget and time. Especially in small quantity and
with the same vendor of materials.
Intel worked on the reference design
for 2 years - I guess 1997 and 1998 - connecting
those 18 data lines to their controller.

In mass production the product life time is 6
months, thanks to Intel "innovation" again.
Me thinks that the third party designs, even
when "copied exactly" to the best of their
knowledge, just do not work at all,
so the term "failure rate" is not applicable.
I believe there must be tremendous difficulties
with various RIMM configurations, "compatibility"
with variety of RIMM vendors, etc.
IMHO.