Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (40509)	9/21/1999 3:06:00 AM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 116762

Richard, I would like to expand on what you mentioned in your post, and do so in a simple but possible high impact manner. <<If guilt or innocence is determined not by what you can do or by what you know but rather by who you are?????????>> If Bill Murphy of GATA is correct in his opinion that the manipulation of the price of gold is just a part of a larger Watergate type scandal, and if the following is on the mark, <<Is Martin far less guilty than many? Perhaps, he simply figured out the game & started playing along?>> with <<Should there be more parties looked at?>> then Martin Armstrong can replace a <<...guilt or innocence...>> focus by law enforcement thru his ability to "bring to the table" information to break wide open into public view stuff not like opening a can of worms, but to remove the top and have Martin turn the can over and spill out the contents of worm_like_cockroaches all running and hiding. if so, then <<Will the jail cells soon be full?>> yes, as in overflowing.... Also, you may have tapped into one of my channels of info, as in what advice is being given to Martin to move towards safety, knowing that as you wondered if Martin was not in the loop or part of the long going plans, but just guessed it out thru observations and decided that since it was "fixed" to place his own bets. This way Martin tried to save=help his clients by placing more bets with that new money, NOT for his personnal gain, but to get back money he lost for others, to undo his mistakes. Bottom line, his intent was not to steal the new money so as to make himself money thru that p--- scam, but he "borrowed" the new money to be used to only bet on the ongoing manipulation of markets and currency which he was NOT part of, past or present, and make enough money to first repay back the new money he "borrowed", and the rest to make up for the loses he did onto older clients. Very good position, true or not, if he puts goodies onto the table. doug