Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: qdog who wrote (250)	9/21/1999 8:55:00 AM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 12253

qdog and Eric L: Now I know what a dumb piece of wood feels like when it is torn up by a buzz saw. Don't think I will use the phrase "flat out wrong" soon again. I simply read the link and it bore no relationship to the situation now. I therefore used the unfortunate phrase "flat out wrong" and so I asked for the date of publication since I found none in, near or around the article itself so I could put the story in perspective. You have done that for me in spades. Yes I am sensitive to attacks on the Q by Cabi and company. There was an orchestrated campaign led by Ericsson for years to destroy the Q and the successful launch of CDMA. But that is history. Ericsson failed to accomplish that. As for your views, as I thought I had shown in my several exchanges with you both, you have my respect. You know a hell of a lot more about any of this than I do - particularly the non Q and non CDMA aspects about which I know least and try to learn as much as I can. Which reminds me qdog, are you willing to say a bit more about what the role of CDMA will be in big wireless fiber pipes and/or other frequencies in the US or will CDMA simply be irrelevant in those situations? Also do you see a WCDMA launch in the US? Best. Chaz