SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: re3 who wrote (26459)9/21/1999 8:03:00 AM
From: Benkea  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 99985
 
ike:

"perhaps they should only be expensed when exercised, as they may never be excersized if the market tanks..."

I strongly disagree. First of all, most of the options in these NON-DIVIDEND paying (IE: retaining 100% of earnings) companies are 10 year options. This means they rise in value owing wholly to the compounding affect of keeping investors' money. Why do CSCO and MSFT have so much cash? Does this sort of thing INFLUENCE dividend policy?

MSFT's average strike on their 892 BILLION options is $11 15/16. That would take sooooooome tank to lower MSFT's (shareholders) cost to anything below that $10.7 bil (892 X $11.94) or the ENTIRE LAST THREE YEAR after tax profit.



To: re3 who wrote (26459)9/21/1999 12:49:00 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Respond to of 99985
 
If the market tanks usually they adjust the price downwards.

In any case the rules are to expense them only wen they are excersized any way.

Haim