SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Ultra Petroleum (UPL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kfdkfd who wrote (4405)9/21/1999 4:36:00 PM
From: kfdkfd  Respond to of 4851
 
Now for a comment on law suit, WAS IT EVER indicated that AOW was suing Ex-Pres and others. My recollection was opposite. So again confusion on what's going on.
On items of this nature lets get all of the facts and don't put emotion and prejudice into play. Peoples investment monies are at stake so we should proceed on a cautious basis in these types of items. It's fine to bring it to peoples attention but we need to only state the facts.
Lets see what the outcome of these procedings brings.



To: kfdkfd who wrote (4405)9/21/1999 4:51:00 PM
From: LowtherAcademy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4851
 
Actually, the hilarious part of this suit really hits the
funny bone when you think that Jarvis and Hislop were both
on the board at UP,and, in my opinion, probably keeping Watford fully informed on Allan's last minute
efforts of trying to keep the Mesa/Gemini prospect from
reverting back to UP. Gee, ever wonder how UP came up with
the AFE figure they gave AOW???? A figure they thought would
be impossible for AOW to pay????? Every wonder why Anschultz had UP indemnify them against legal action by AOW
on this deal????

Lew
Oh, and I have no idea whey Allan hasn't filed a statement
of defense yet.

Oh, and ever wonder about this:
This is the same land tht Watford sold Anschultz for under
$900 an acre. Allan's figures work out to about $5,000
per acre for AOW in the deal he made.




To: kfdkfd who wrote (4405)9/21/1999 5:20:00 PM
From: LowtherAcademy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4851
 
Kevin, Actually, UP NEVER SERVED MR. LAIRD.

I suspect they'll be hearing from Mr. Bruner's,
Mr. Erickson's and Mr. Laird's attorneys shortly