Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sword who wrote (44584)	9/21/1999 6:17:00 PM
From: lifeisgood	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

Well said Sword. Unfortunately, SI administrators appear to have egos that sometime interfere with their ability to think rationally and practically. It's really a shame.

To: Sword who wrote (44584)	9/21/1999 8:00:00 PM
From: robt justine	Respond to of 122087

Hi Sword: You said: <<SI has shipwrecked itself upon it's own barrier reef of subjective rules and inconsistent interpretation and application of these rules to Tony. The investor community at large is hurt by this.>> Excellent imagery, sword. Can you elucidate on why you believe that SI is subjective in their rules' enforcement? Do you have information that they are applying their rules inconsistently? If so, I would appreciate it if you could post your research backing up your premise. Thanks. Also, if Mr. Elgindy were an asset to the investment community (and I personally believe that he is not) then SI's actions would still not "hurt" the "investment community". His website is still available, as I understand it, to what you call the "investment community". <<I am disappointed in SI management and hope that they have the courage and the wisdom to actively, not passively, pursue Tony's reinstatement.>> I believe that their courage has already been exhibited in ridding this thread and others of the anti-social behavior of Mr. Elgindy.