Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: out_of_the_loop who wrote (3872)	9/22/1999 12:45:00 AM
From: Druss	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Howard--I am not concerned about the fact it was done before. It is a bad study. Having been done before doesn't make it better or really prove anything. Quigley did a bad study and GUMM duplicated it to prove they are better?? With your background I think you would honestly agree with me that it is poor to bad science. GUMM may or may not work, I don't have an investment in that side of it and I haven't seen other work addressing its effectiveness, I am just saying this is a poor study. All the Best Druss