To: lorne who wrote (40598 ) 9/22/1999 2:14:00 AM From: PaulM Respond to of 116782
Lorne, B, take alook: AngloGold Says Bid for Gold Failed "End of quarter buying would have allowed the South African miner to deliver into some of its hedges..." "Williams suggested the successful purchase...by fellow South African miner Gold Fields Ltd could have been to cover hedges in place for its Beatrix mine...."biz.yahoo.com P.S. No mystery here. In a sense, virtually all the producers are short One very general way to look at "hedging" is taking the short side of something that your inherently long in. Except the miners are inherently long gold in the ground (and that has to be taken out of the ground). It may be difficult to make good on previosuly agreed to deliveries, or deliveries on demand, when your costs are rising, oil prices are rising , strikes are more frequent, etc. while your return price is fixed. And it's likely to get harder and harder, particularaly for the South African producers of the type featured in this article. I think a lot of goldbugs are confused by the role miners play in the gold market. They, along with the BB's and CB's were a very natural part of the system, which only today is manifesting its flaws. The CB's provided a cheap source of exploration financing and good business for along time (effectively allowing production a decade forwrd to finance current exploration!) Who wouldn't be tempted by that? In my view, the statement by Anglogold suggest the gloves are now off. A sudden, severe rise in the POG is in the interest of no one associaetd with the gold maket, including the miners. But, by the same token, I think Anglogold's statements are a reflection that everybody (miners, Rothschild bullion bank, Swiss CB etc.) is upset with the BOE for going too far, i.e., for driving the price so low liquidity has disappeared.