Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Pink who wrote (42142)	9/23/1999 2:46:00 PM
From: Doug R	Respond to of 152472

Message 11292037 I run the ACMRXYZ group of stocks on the above thread Pinkster boy...using my technical analysis. Don't worry about the expense...lol. Doug R

To: Mr. Pink who wrote (42142)	10/12/1999 1:17:00 AM
From: Doug R	Respond to of 152472

"Ha, your foolish technical anlaysis has gotten you into trouble again...Still bullish on ACRT?" Oh yeah...I forgot to answer your other ridiculous comment on ACRT. techstocks.com I posted that less than a month and more than 18% UP ago......one week before your question to me. tsk, tsk pinky. What I said here about QCOM was that it performed a charting feat that called for a drop to a point that was predetermined by the activity leading to that feat. I also said that, as far as I know, MSFT was the only other stock I have seen that did NOT fall under the weight of this activity. Although, at the time, QCOM did fall quickly to under 140 from around 168 it did not reach the target set by the chart activity. It should have been taken as information that if QCOM is in the same league as MSFT, it would not cave in. I believe there was only one person on this thread that recognized that. Most took it as some kind of attack on the stock. It was information. What you take from it and how you use it is up to you I suppose. You seemed to have taken it like a fool. Doug R