SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Lloyd who wrote (68021)9/22/1999 12:35:00 PM
From: benwood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Don, what you said is true, a good CEO can make a difference.

Was this just phenomenon of the CEO being so vitally important only discovered in 1990 when top executive salaries began to skyrocket?

There is a positive feedback loop now with CEO salaries and stock appreciation which has resulted in every trick in the book being used to bolster the stock price even when it's at the expense of the long term health of the company and/or it's employees. Much of it is purely greed driven, in my opinion, by the frequently self-serving top executives (IBM for example) and/or by the shareholders who figure, "What's another 25 million for the big guy if my stock goes up 50% again this year?" It's also greed combined with panic by the boards of these same companies: we'd better do everything we can to sign this guy, cuz our projections show he's the one that will allow us to overtake Microsoft! And with hundreds of billions of dollars in market cap at stake, might as well pay him a gazillion dollars, because it won't matter when we're all rich!"

Later, "Boy, that guy stunk, give him his golden parachute and let's get us another free agent superstar!"



To: Don Lloyd who wrote (68021)9/22/1999 3:57:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
don, we will have to agree to disagree. competent ceos would produce results more similar than different.

incompetent ceos should not be part of this discussion, imho.

in any case, my premise still stands, in my mind, that current stock valuations are due more to reckless credit expansion by alan greenbean than by *extra* effort, deserving of massive extra amounts of compensation, put out by ceos.