Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: out_of_the_loop who wrote (3905)	9/22/1999 5:47:00 PM
From: Mad2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Howard you posted I have even agreed to stop posting completely here on SI if Zicam is not successful and accepted by the medical community within a year from now. I challenged Mr.Wexler and Mad2 to do the same if it is indeed successful and neither of them has taken me up on that offer. The only reason I did that is because they base their claims on accusations against good, decent people whom they are promoting a stock fraud Where have I accused GUMM of promoting a stock fraud? Howard as you have done with your presentation of GUMM as a investment, you mix up a bunch of issues and spew it out to serve the purpose of your point. BTW I have posted many times my opinion that I think GUMM will fail and that in my opinion it is very much a long shot (I give it less than a 5% chance of sucess....meaning maintaining its current share price/value). Furthermore I admit that if this rumored NEJM article does come out (sounds slim, if not then I'll be a victim of your hype) the stock would spike (only to come back down when financial results don't mirror the expectations you and Dan have been claiming). I can understand why you might quit SI if your wrong but I certianly won't. In fact what is the purpose behind that statement? Am I to infer (or should some others) from that statement that a investment in GUMM is a lay down or that they are good people. What are you trying to prove? Why? If the answer is that GUMM mgmt are good people? Well I don't know them (and don't care to), don't claim to and can only judge their actions and performance. Or is the answer that your trying to convince others into buying the story you (claim to) believe and in the process convert them to the ranks of GUMM longs? If its the latter, then you a stock tout and that explaines the dogged determination by which you seek to attack those who feel GUMM is overvalued and a very risky long. Mad2