Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: double-plus-good who wrote (51632)	9/22/1999 1:53:00 PM
From: Think4Yourself	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

Playing devils advocate here... Like many of the EnP's now, I am a strong believer in 3D seismic. It is highly accurate and can supply lots of drill sites on good land. Surprisingly, that's why I am concerned about the companies that do seismic The EnP's I am interested in already have their 3D done, and it has given them long lists of excellent prospects. Why would they need more seismic anytime soon?

To: double-plus-good who wrote (51632)	9/22/1999 2:36:00 PM
From: double-plus-good	Respond to of 95453

EEX they seem to change their mind about drilling targets about as often as Slider changes his stock pick du jour. Selling all the NG onshore at the bottom has proved to be a poor choice. Now they are being forced into the corner of having to prove the reserves of their one wet gulf well. Count me a buyer at under 3. CRK hanging tough. Time to pick your horses once again. ++good