Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (60538)	9/22/1999 3:38:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Bradley, no slave to the First Amendment: Bradley says advocacy groups should pay for opponents' responses to ads By Donald Lambro THE WASHINGTON TIMES Democratic presidential candidate Bill Bradley proposed yesterday that all advocacy groups who run political ads should be required to pay opponents for the cost of responding to them. While campaigning in New Hampshire, the former New Jersey senator, who is a strong advocate of campaign finance reform, said that "special interest groups that run political advertisements should pay their opponents to respond," according to the Associated Press. washtimes.com Actually maybe it's not so moronic after all. Maybe we could mandate 10% of all abortion fees go to anti abortion groups. 20% of dues to the ABA should go to groups advocating tort reform. 2cents of every ad dollar from NBC, ABC, CBS news could go to the Media Research Center.