SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: qdog who wrote (1825)9/22/1999 9:08:00 PM
From: Clarksterh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
qdog - Why was it that certain companies that QCOM licensed, cross license patent with QCOM for more favorable fee's and what were those patents?

Undoubtedly other companies have IPR in cellular, and even in CDMA. Some of it is even useful to Qualcomm. BUT (knew that was coming!), having read many of the other CDMA patents I would stake a lot of money (come to think of it, I've already done that<g>)on some of Qualcomm's patents in mobile cellular CDMA being essentially unbypassable, and most other companies' patents being much less critical (read 'much easier/cheaper to bypass if need be'.).

Having said that, Ericsson over the last few years has been really rolling out research on some of the next phases of CDMA. This may indeed result in some future IPR swap, but I would still say that Qualcomm has the considerable edge.

FWIW, All JMO.

Clark



To: qdog who wrote (1825)9/23/1999 12:39:00 AM
From: Michael  Respond to of 13582
 
<I guess I missed the discussion about QCOM is an anagram for CDMA. >
cdma.com
qualcomm.com

does it look like cdma is an anagram to Qualcommm

sure is a nice Q day
Michael