SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tero kuittinen who wrote (2340)9/23/1999 10:21:00 AM
From: gdichaz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34857
 
Tero: Always delighted when you inject "a fact or two here". Look forward to that whenever I come to the Nokia thread - which I do to learn. Plus remember my slogan, "Qualcomm and Nokia. Together the world !"

Best.

Chaz



To: tero kuittinen who wrote (2340)9/23/1999 3:44:00 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 34857
 
Hi. I'm long Nokia and have been lurking here since the beginning of the year. I first considered Nokia as an investment after I became a Sprint Spectrum customer and was impressed by my new Nokia handset.

I thought the thread might be interested in the current conversion from Sprint Spectrum to PCS. Contrary to what this Post article says, the letters I have received from Sprint Spectrum say that this is being done as a settlement in a law suit.

Karen

From the Washington Post:

Sprint Spectrum Shutdown Hits Static

By Peter S. Goodman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 23, 1999; Page E01

Faces taut with frustration, a dozen people waited in line
under the mood lights at the Sprint store in downtown
Washington. Trouble filled the room--phones that couldn't
be activated, choice models hopelessly out of stock, calls
lost in oblivion.

The company was shutting down its once-pioneering
cellular phone network, Sprint Spectrum, shifting its more
than 100,000 Spectrum customers to a newer service by the
end of the year. Here, as in stores throughout the
Washington and Baltimore areas, crowds of people--some
angry, many confused--waited in the hopes of leaving with a
phone that would work on the new system.

"It's a disaster," complained Jeff Nussbaum, 24, a federal
worker. Despite hours spent trying to program his new
phone to his old number, it refused to ring. The company's
customer service line offered no relief. "I was on hold for
more than 20 minutes," he said.

As if that weren't enough, the phone Nussbaum was
struggling to activate wasn't the model he wanted. He'd
been forced to accept a Motorola Startac rather than the
sleek Nokia that better matched the features of his old one.
The Nokia was sold out. "We do not have it," informed a
sign near the entrance. "We do not have an estimated date
of replenishment."

"This is Kafkaesque," Nussbaum said, his eyes rolling
skyward.

Less than two years ago, when Nussbaum signed up for
Spectrum, the service was marketed as a gateway to the
future, the nation's first all-digital network. Today it is a relic
of Sprint's past, a stranded hamlet on the modern
communications map: The system serves only Washington
and Baltimore. Sprint is moving its Spectrum customers to
its new, national network, Sprint PCS, which claims 4
million users.

"I feel like I bought a Beta VCR," Nussbaum groused.

The "migration," as Sprint calls it, requires Spectrum
customers to trade in their old phones for PCS-compatible
ones while keeping their old numbers.

As the company portrays it, the transition is happening
smoothly enough, considering the undertaking. Shortages
of phones have been a problem. Help lines and stores have
been jammed. But those are the exceptions, the company
says.

"We've got an overwhelming response to this," said Brian J.
McIntee, Sprint PCS area vice president. "We're not happy
about the fact that customers have to wait on line for an
extended period of time. We're not happy that customers
have to wait on hold on the customer-care lines. But we
also have many, many customers where this migration has
gone flawlessly."

In recent weeks, McIntee said, Sprint has extended store
hours to handle the crush, while boosting the ranks of
customer-service operators by nearly a third.

At the root of the trouble is a basic technological divide.
Spectrum runs on a technology known as GSM, which is
incompatible with the new system's technology, CDMA.
GSM is used by roughly 130 million people in Europe,
lending it appeal as a transatlantic standard. While the new
Sprint PCS phones don't work in Europe, the old Spectrum
ones do.

But ever since Sprint claimed a series of new frequencies in
1995, it has been erecting a national network using CDMA.
The company says calls over CDMA sound clearer and the
system carries data faster--a key virtue, as communications
networks increasingly carry great flows of computer traffic.

Even as Sprint has expanded its new national network into
the Baltimore-Washington area, it kept the old system
running. For the past 18 months, the area has been served
by both.

But this year the company decided that running two
systems was cumbersome and muddied its marketing
efforts. PCS customers are eligible for flat-rate plans that
involve no roaming or long-distance charges, since Sprint's
newer network runs in virtually every major market. But
Spectrum customers frequently pay roaming and
long-distance charges when they carry their phones beyond
the local airwaves.

"With Sprint Spectrum, you're sort of on an island," said
company spokesman Larry McDonnell. "It made sense for
us to upgrade our Spectrum customers."

Sprint designed a system that was supposed to prevent a
rush of customers to its stores. The company sent out
letters early this summer announcing that the switch was
coming. Then it sent brochures offering customers a choice
of three phone models. If customers wanted a different
phone, Sprint applied a $50 credit toward the purchase.

Sprint mails out the new phones and asks customers to call
a hot line to activate them. Then Sprint sends a
postage-paid box for customers to return their old phones.

But the system has not prevented a flood of customers to
Sprint stores from Rockville to Laurel to downtown
Washington.

As Paul Gresham, manager at the store on 18th Street NW
in the District, surveyed a packed room, he blamed the
troubles on those who had not followed the instructions.
"It's a disaster because our customers aren't doing this
through the mail like they're supposed to," he said.

Many say they were forced to go to stores when the system
failed. While new PCS customers report no special
problems, Spectrum customers have encountered myriad
adventures.

Ming Ngo, 26, a D.C. police officer, said he never received
instructions on how to trade in his phone. He was making
his fifth trip to the store to try to get his new phone
programmed.

Aziz Ahmed, 23, a student, said he didn't find out about the
change until his Spectrum phone stopped working and he
took it in for service. When he received his new phone and
called Sprint to activate it, he was put on hold for more than
half an hour.

But while Ahmed was able to dial out on his new phone, no
one could reach him. "I would ask my friends, 'Why didn't
you call back?' " he said. "They were like, 'Dude, we did
call back. We got your voice mail.' "

Ahmed dialed his cell-phone number himself: voice mail,
indeed. Four days in a row, he dialed the customer service
number, once staying on the line for three hours, he said.
Each time, new codes failed to provide a fix. "It seems like,
over the phone, they don't know what they're doing," he
said.

Distraught, Ahmed took the phone to the Sprint store,
where a salesman finally discovered the trouble: Someone
had left his old Spectrum account open. The calls were
going into the void.

But the mishaps didn't end there. On this day, Ahmed was
in line again, trying to fine out why his efforts to dial out
brought a recorded voice that cheerfully informed him his
number had been "temporarily disconnected."

Across the Spectrum

Sprint says customers can get better service in the shift
from Sprint Spectrum to PCS by:

Calling the customer service line at 1-800-311-4221 before 9
a.m. or after 9 p.m. and avoiding lunch hour on weekdays.
Customer service is available 24 hours a day.

Visiting stores on Sunday, when there are fewer customers.
Stores in this area are:

Washington 202-496-9400

Gaithersburg 301-987-5220

Laurel 301-483-6333

Rockville 301-984-2000

Towson 410-296-7100

Tysons Corner 703-448-7447

Reston 703-742-7778

Annandale 703-914-4555

Annapolis 410-224-4300

Baltimore 410-244-6550

Columbia 410-740-8250

SOURCE: Sprint

¸ 1999 The Washington Post Company



To: tero kuittinen who wrote (2340)9/24/1999 11:09:00 AM
From: D.J.Smyth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
Tero, all: Jim Lurgio gets a letter printed in WSJ, Sept. 23:

Lurgio made it to the WSJ yesterday. Letter to Anders:

(posted Sept 23 in the WSJ letters section)

InterDigital Interest
Mr. Anders,

RE: ("Shareholders' Site Disagrees With Analysts on InterDigital") I found it interesting that The Wall Street Journal was the first to give Bill Dalglish's site some exposure and I'm sure many more writers will follow your lead. I'm also happy you provided some comments from those who claim to follow the industry.

The article states: "Industry analysts say InterDigital was beaten in the wireless business by heavyweights like Qualcomm. 'If things had turned out differently some years ago, and technology had gone a different way, we could be talking about InterDigital as the billion-dollar giant today instead of Qualcomm. But it just didn't work out like that,' says Iain Gillott."

The only thing Qualcomm (QCOM) has beaten IDC in is the licensing of their technology and as investors in IDC we are hoping for the same success. As industry analysts know, Qualcomm sold their infrastructure unit to L.M. Ericsson (ERICY) because it was a losing part of the business and also their joint venture on handsets hasn't been that profitable.

So how has QCOM amassed all this wealth? If we look at the CDMA wealth alone the bottom line is licensing and alliance revenues and the sales of ASICs to the licensees who are unable to design their own.

Let's look at some numbers. There are well over 200-million users of TDMA/GSM and 30-million users of CDMA or Qualcomm's IS-95 so what does Mr. Gillott mean when he said "if technology had gone the other way"? With GSM/TDMA users outnumbering IS-95 users 7-to-1 what he doesn't realize is that it has gone the other way. China was to be a prime target for CDMA or IS-95, yet billions in GSM contracts have been awarded in 1999 while very little or nothing has been awarded for CDMA. Assuming InterDigital was as successful as Qualcomm in the licensing of their patents and we look at the number of users, who's the better investment of the two? InterDigital has less than 20 licensees and Qualcomm around 60.

The patent dispute between Motorola and InterDigital was a devastating loss to us investors and sent all the analysts covering IDC to the exits. Had the Supreme Court's Markman decision come a few days earlier things might be much different now. For InterDigital's fate to be sealed by jurors who had no knowledge or understanding of patents or the technology is a miscarriage of justice that will be righted in the ERICY versus IDC litigation. It was during the Markman pre-trial hearing that ERICY and Qualcomm came to terms and ended their dispute and many of us InterDigital investors feel the same will happen with our dispute.

With ERICY laying claim to have built almost 50 % of the infrastructure for the over 200 million users of GSM/TDMA the revenues that could come from ERICY alone in this litigation is staggering. It will also produce licensing agreements from the many companies who are lurking in the shadows hoping ERICY can give IDC the knockout punch.

If 1.5 % for infrastructure and 3 % for handsets are reasonable numbers, how much might IDC have coming for over 200-million users of which many are on second and third-generation handsets? With almost $2 in cash and another dollar in tax write-offs this stock is priced like an option with no expiration.

Most analysts think Qualcomm holds the keys to the castle technology-wise and I hope you might ask the analysts that if this is so, then why has Nokia -- the leading handset manufacturer in the world -- chosen InterDigital to help them in their 3-G effort ?

Jim Lurgio
jlurgio@bigfoot.com



To: tero kuittinen who wrote (2340)9/27/1999 8:44:00 PM
From: slacker711  Respond to of 34857
 

Congratulations on the promotion...Have you moved?

Tero Kuittinen is the Vice President of Wireless Telecommunications, an investment firm based in New York. The firm may hold positions in companies featured in his columns. The opinions expressed in the columns are personal views of Mr. Kuittinen and they should not be interpreted as investment advice.

theregister.co.uk

Slacker



To: tero kuittinen who wrote (2340)9/27/1999 9:52:00 PM
From: Eric L  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
Tero,

As Slacker has said, "Congratulations on the promotion".

- Eric -