Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Le coin des francophones -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Devil's Advocate who wrote (4093)	9/23/1999 3:08:00 PM
From: kamtrader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77509

Devil, avoir voulu avoir ‚t‚ m‚chant tu aurais d‚plac‚ ton point de 2 z‚ro vers la gauche. qui a dit que tu ‚tais le d‚mon, mais j'aimerais t'amener ver un sujet int‚ressant advenant une m‚ga correction lente et p‚nible comment crois-tu que tes stocks vont r‚agir dans le temps. naturellement tout ceci n'est que hypoth‚tique. kam

To: Devil's Advocate who wrote (4093)	9/23/1999 3:33:00 PM
From: Claude M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77509

D-A ce que je n'ai pas aim‚ de tes post c'est que tu as ‚t‚ sur le post de LUMM et que tu as envoy‚ des commentaires n‚gatifs, et ce: SANS AVOIR DU LUMM, ET SANS ÒTRE AU COURANT DE LA CIE. ET SANS VOULOIR EN ACHETER! Je ne comprend pas TA raison de ces post! Sounds like a lot of promotion lately ... I was referring to other participants doing promotion, like canadian stock brokers. It would be sad to see this one turn out to be a pump and dump. If I was in, I would sell now and wait for it to come back to a more realistic level before coming back in. I wouldn't put to much trust in the support levels mentionned in the article. It is precisely that part of the article that tickles me. I'm sure LUMM did not provide a technical analysis of their stock to the National Post. Tu as envoy‚ ‡a sur 3-4 post et je ne comprend pas ton int‚rest!!!! Je ne sais pas quel age tu as, mais il faudrait que tu commence … r‚fl‚chir … ce que tu dis et ‚cris! Pour le post, je ne voulais pas d'argument c'est la raison pour laquelle j'ai envoy‚ ce post … N-x parce-que je te connais, je sais que tu aimes les arguments; pas pour jouer dans ton dos! Mais, en faisant vite par erreur j'ai cliquer sur le mauvais non LE TIENS Salut! Claude