To: Martin E. Frankel who wrote (35013 ) 9/24/1999 11:00:00 AM From: Suzanne Newsome Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44908
Marty, slaffe, FREAKAZOID! Why it's nostalgia day on the thread! Marty, thanks for your post-you may have just doubled the maturity index on the thread. I agree with you that we are taking too close a view of this company. It is like we are trying to read the newspaper with a magnifying glass. We may be able to identify a few letters, but we are not getting the gist of the entire story. May I elaborate on a point that Marty made? Many of us intended for this stock to have popped a long time ago. It kind of "popped" in the wrong direction. There is still reason for optimism. If TSIG really becomes a profitable Internet stock in the 4th quarter, who knows what the stock will do. Regardless of the scenario that plays out, TSIG faces selling all the way up. There are the people who bought at $.05 and who will sell at $.10. There are the "longs" who bought at $.35, averaged down to $.25, and having had the investment scare of their lives, will sell with great relief at $.25. Then there are the daytraders-'nuff said about that. TSIG will be attracting a whole new set of shareholders as the stock goes up. There will be people who think they are getting the value of a lifetime when they buy at $.50. My point? Much of the selling you see over the next several months may have nothing to do with the fundamental prospects of the company. It will simply reflect people's very, very short-term goals. Much has been said about the "failure" of the Babe Ruth deal. In previous posts I have enumerated all the factors that were working against the success of that deal. Babe Ruth in 2000 will be different IMO. The company has learned from this year's mistakes, plus they have learned from their association with Lifetime Learning. Similarly, next year with the first year already under their belt, Lifetime Learning could be another story entirely. My school district has about 40 schools; perhaps 25 schools are middle and high schools which may be appropriate for the MusicCard fund-raiser. Would it be wise for the county school office to put an untested fund-raiser in all 25 schools? Probably not. But after the success in one school, or hearing about the success in other schools, it would be a logical step to place this fund-raiser in 12-15 of the county schools. These are two particular examples of what Marty means when he says "Rome was not built in a day." We have pretty much DD'd to death the MusicCard in the schools. We have not spent as much time on the PhotoCard. We hardly have a clue about Eoc.net. We have a wait-and-see attitude about TEMPO. I believe it is highly possible that there are revenue sources ahead for TSIG that we have not even thought of. But if we spend our time giving REW the 3rd degree because some mailing may or may not have gone out the day he reported it would, we are going to miss the big story here. We must not lose perspective. Marty said, "All good things take time and for a startup company that can be years. The rewards, if successful however, can be enormous." Each individual has the right to sell out when he chooses to. Far be it for me to tell anybody how to manage his investments. However, for those people who are living for "next week," keep your whining to yourself. Good luck to all investors. May TSIG exceed your every expectation. Regards, Suzanne