Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (30347)	9/24/1999 5:28:00 AM
From: dumbmoney	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

FYI, Glaskowsky/MPR are very much pro-Rambus, and in any case, would not lie. They have reputations i have no opinion on their reputation but isn't this the same org that initiated the phony ibm story? No.

To: unclewest who wrote (30347)	9/24/1999 5:34:00 AM
From: unclewest	Respond to of 93625

i have searched all of my regular news sources for a hint of confirmation of the c-net story. i have found none.

To: unclewest who wrote (30347)	9/24/1999 10:02:00 AM
From: grok	Respond to of 93625

RE: <i believe this is the same org that initiated the ibm dumps rmbs story around the first of june. 3 days later ibm said they planned to not only use rambus but they will produce rdrams.> Absolutely not.

To: unclewest who wrote (30347)	9/24/1999 10:11:00 AM
From: Estephen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

"This Cnet news is FUD. Not just any old FUD...the most cleverly set up and perfectly timed FUD ever.The timing is obvious,actually too obvious.But cHeck THIS out.Glaskowsky who is quoted as having talked to the Intel guys works for Microdesign Resources. Microdesign is owned by our dear friends Cahners Electronicz Group which also owns In-Stat whose employees include the renowned BERT McCOMAS!!This guy has been dishing dirt forever and you'd think the Rambus truck ran over his mother.This guy should have worked for "Nixon-Dirty Tricks,Inc. Boy am I relieved I thought we actually had a problem! "" How do these people get away with this crap? I'm talking about the c-net article, People who get sucker by this c-net/ chaners type bullsh@t loose money, possibly a lot. Didn't the crooks a WSJ "heard on the street" go the jail for this kind of stuff?