Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MRV Communications (MRVC) opinions? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sector Investor who wrote (15924)	9/24/1999 8:26:00 AM
From: signist	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42804

Just a coincidence? (vbg) John

To: Sector Investor who wrote (15924)	9/24/1999 8:32:00 AM
From: signist	Respond to of 42804

I like your map. A whole lot better than mine. (g) John (he he)

To: Sector Investor who wrote (15924)	9/24/1999 9:06:00 AM
From: Greg h2o	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42804

certainly not trying to fan the flames of rumor... but, Noam WAS in silicon value discussing financing of the startups with several possible strategic partners. don't know which ones....

To: Sector Investor who wrote (15924)	9/24/1999 11:59:00 AM
From: Bridge Player	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42804

<< that NAC would be moving within 3 weeks from Santa Barbara to San Jose to be near a "large, well known public company" that was going to take a 20% equity position in them in exchange for 2nd round funding money. >> Sector, pardon my naivete, but is it, ipso facto, a net positive for MRVC to have another company (prospective partner?) take a 20% equity stake in a start-up? Because their (diluted) equity would now potentially be a smaller part of an (eventual) much larger pie? I suspect the answer is "yes" but maybe I just wanted to hear you say it <g> BP