Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kayaker who wrote (42446)	9/24/1999 10:26:00 PM
From: Bill Dalglish	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

CDMA - Does QCOM own wideband AND narrowband? I've been trying to figure out all day where the huge influx of visitors to our www.TelecomTechStocks.com web site from SI was coming from. Friday alone, we had over 50% more visitors (total 330 plus) than our previous highest day. And there was a 1000% increase in visitors from Silicon Investor Friday. Well, this post from Bob Craig (and its predecessor posts from Rose Campion and ruffian) must be the cause: To: Rose_Campion who wrote (42416) From: Bob Craig Friday, Sep 24 1999 10:37AM ET Respond to Post # 42447 of 42488 "Some investors, however, falsely believe that because third and fourth generation wireless standards will be based on CDMA, therefore Qualcomm will be the chief beneficiary. But Qualcomm's technology is narrowband CDMA while most of the world will adapt third and fourth generation technology which is wideband CDMA, a much different animal telecomtechstocks.com Not so OT Rose. Definitely a man with an agenda. He seems to be suggesting that Q's patents don't extend to WCDMA. I wouldn't qualify him as "objective" but... If I remember, IJ (at the analysts meeting) said it didn't matter what flavor of CDMA came next, ie, Q gets its royalties. I look forward to rebuttals from those more in the know..." -end of Bob's post- Thanks for the offer of an opportunity for rebuttals, Bob! There are other sections of this new www.TelecomTechStocks.com web site (featured in the Wall Street Journal's "Heard on the Net" column Sept. 11) that might also be of interest to readers on this Qualcomm thread. For example: 1. Qualcomm has its own "button" for links to up-to-date stats, news and other web sites of particular interest to QCOM investors. This is found on the site's home page at: telecomtechstocks.com 2. Banner headlines, which change daily, link visitors to the latest important news for QCOM, Ericsson, Nokia, InterDigital, Nortel, Cisco and Texas Instruments. Again,its near the top on the home page at: telecomtechstocks.com 3. A piece on the site called "Narrowband vs. Wideband CDMA: Its all about bandwidth, stupid!" is part of a beginners' level article explaining technology in easy to grasp (if perhaps over simplified) language. Article is called: "Telecom Technology for Non-Techies" It can be found at: telecomtechstocks.com 4. "Next Generation Engineering" section briefly notes the interrelationship of Qualcomm, Ericsson, Nokia and InterDigital in the press toward 3rd and 4th generation international standards. It is at: telecomtechstocks.com 5. Finally, a section labeled "Competition Risks" notes the importance of Qualcomm and its pioneering work with CDMA as a fierce competitor to InterDigital, Ericsson and Nokia, among others. It is at: telecomtechstocks.com Again, thanks for the invitation of rebuttals, Bob! Sure hope your move went well today and your getting settled in your new abode! Bill Dalglish PS I've invested in QCOM for a long while, along with other Telecom tech & equipment companies. I've done well with QCOM stock, but believe in "lightening up" from time to time by buying other up and comers. Sure wish others had management and public relations staffs to equal Qualcomm - Never found any better so far!